![]() ![]() § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document that does not include the "time and place" of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information, such that an immigration court must enter a removal order in absentia and deny a noncitizen's request to rescind that order. Whether the government provides notice "required under" and "in accordance with paragraph (1) or (2) of" 8 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)(ii), incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense (as the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits have held), or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense (as the Eleventh Circuit held below). ![]() Whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. Which version of federal law should a sentencing court consult under ACCA’s categorical approach? Whether courts must apply a presumption of good faith to a legislature's racial intent when considering a challenge to legislative districts whether courts must disentangle race from politics when considering such challenges and whether courts must consider a district's compliance with traditional districting principles before finding that the legislature predominantly considered race when drawing districts. ![]() South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP Whether a self-appointed Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 “tester” has Article III standing to challenge a place of public accommodation’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she lacks any intention of visiting that place of public accommodation.Īlexander v. įuture argument dates are in parentheses arguments in these cases have been scheduled, but have not, and potentially may not, take place. Do not believe smugglers or others claiming to have exclusive information.This is a list of cases before the United States Supreme Court that the Court has agreed to hear and has not yet decided. government sources and through international organizations that are working with governments in the region, including the United States. Individuals encountered at the Southwest Border who cannot establish a legal basis to remain in the United States will be removed or expelled.įactual information on this process is available through official U.S. MPP enrollees should follow the directions on their court documents and tear sheets to appear for their scheduled court date as required.ĭHS continues to enforce our nation’s immigration and public health laws, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Title 42 public health order as required by court order. The Department will provide additional information in the coming days. ![]() Individuals disenrolled from MPP will continue their removal proceedings in the United States.Īs Secretary Mayorkas has said, MPP has endemic flaws, imposes unjustifiable human costs, and pulls resources and personnel away from other priority efforts to secure our border. Individuals are no longer being newly enrolled into MPP, and individuals currently in MPP in Mexico will be disenrolled when they return for their next scheduled court date. DHS is committed to ending the court-ordered implementation of MPP in a quick, and orderly, manner. Supreme Court’s June 30th decision, to lift the injunction that required DHS to reimplement the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) in good faith. District Court’s decision, which follows the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |